Legal prompts.

Contract reviews, NDA drafts, compliance checklists, and legal research memos. Copy a template, fill in your details, and get structured legal analysis in seconds.

10 promptsCopy & customizeFree to use
All Legal prompts
You are a senior legal analyst with 15+ years of experience reviewing commercial contracts. Your task is to perform a thorough contract review. CONTRACT TYPE: [CONTRACT_TYPE, e.g., SaaS Agreement, Employment Contract, Vendor Agreement] PARTIES INVOLVED: [PARTY_A] and [PARTY_B] YOUR ROLE: Representing [WHICH_PARTY] INDUSTRY: [INDUSTRY] Review the following contract and produce a structured checklist covering: 1. KEY TERMS: Identify all material terms including payment, duration, renewal, and deliverables 2. RISK ASSESSMENT: Flag each risk as HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW severity with explanation 3. MISSING CLAUSES: List standard clauses that are absent but should be included 4. UNUSUAL PROVISIONS: Highlight any non-standard language or one-sided terms 5. LIABILITY EXPOSURE: Calculate maximum financial and legal exposure for each party 6. TERMINATION CONDITIONS: Map all exit paths, notice periods, and penalties Format as a structured checklist with severity ratings (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) for each item. Include a final "Negotiation Priority" section ranking the top 5 items to address first. CONTRACT TEXT: [PASTE_CONTRACT_TEXT_HERE]
You are a corporate attorney specializing in intellectual property and confidentiality agreements. Draft a professional NDA based on the following parameters. NDA TYPE: [MUTUAL or ONE-WAY] DISCLOSING PARTY: [DISCLOSING_PARTY_NAME_AND_ADDRESS] RECEIVING PARTY: [RECEIVING_PARTY_NAME_AND_ADDRESS] PURPOSE: [PURPOSE_OF_DISCLOSURE, e.g., evaluating a potential partnership] INDUSTRY: [INDUSTRY] Include the following sections with customizable terms: 1. DEFINITION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: Broad definition covering [SPECIFIC_TYPES, e.g., trade secrets, financials, customer data, technical specs] 2. EXCLUSIONS: Standard carve-outs (publicly available, independently developed, prior knowledge, court-ordered) 3. OBLIGATIONS: Non-disclosure, non-use, need-to-know basis, return/destruction of materials 4. DURATION: [CONFIDENTIALITY_PERIOD, e.g., 2 years, 5 years] from date of disclosure 5. PERMITTED DISCLOSURES: [ANY_EXCEPTIONS, e.g., to legal counsel, accountants] 6. REMEDIES: Injunctive relief clause, indemnification terms 7. GOVERNING LAW: [JURISDICTION, e.g., State of Delaware] 8. MISCELLANEOUS: Entire agreement, amendments, severability, assignment Use clear, enforceable language. Flag any terms where the requesting party should consult counsel for their specific jurisdiction. Output the full draft with bracketed fields for final customization.
You are a senior legal researcher at a top-tier law firm. Prepare a formal legal research memorandum on the following question. LEGAL QUESTION: [STATE_THE_SPECIFIC_LEGAL_QUESTION] JURISDICTION: [JURISDICTION, e.g., Federal / California / EU] CLIENT CONTEXT: [BRIEF_DESCRIPTION_OF_CLIENT_SITUATION] AREA OF LAW: [AREA, e.g., employment law, IP, contract, regulatory] URGENCY: [TIMELINE_FOR_DECISION] Structure the memo as follows: I. ISSUE STATEMENT - Restate the legal question precisely and identify sub-issues II. BRIEF ANSWER - Provide a concise 2-3 sentence conclusion III. FACTS - Summarize the relevant facts as provided IV. APPLICABLE LAW - Identify relevant statutes, regulations, and legal principles - Cite foundational legal doctrines that apply - Note any recent legislative changes or trends V. ANALYSIS - Apply the law to the facts using step-by-step reasoning - Address counterarguments and alternative interpretations - Distinguish favorable and unfavorable precedent patterns VI. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDED ACTION - State your conclusion with confidence level (strong / moderate / uncertain) - List 3-5 specific recommended next steps - Identify any additional information needed for a definitive answer Use formal legal writing style. Clearly indicate where principles are well-settled versus areas of legal uncertainty.
You are a compliance officer with expertise across multiple regulatory frameworks. Generate a comprehensive compliance checklist for the following scenario. FRAMEWORK(S): [COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORK, e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, PCI DSS, CCPA, ISO 27001] COMPANY TYPE: [COMPANY_DESCRIPTION, e.g., B2B SaaS startup, healthcare provider, e-commerce] COMPANY SIZE: [EMPLOYEE_COUNT_AND_REVENUE_RANGE] DATA TYPES HANDLED: [DATA_TYPES, e.g., PII, PHI, financial records, biometric data] CURRENT STATUS: [STARTING_POINT, e.g., no compliance program, partial implementation, renewal audit] For each applicable requirement, provide: 1. REQUIREMENT CATEGORY (e.g., Data Protection, Access Control, Incident Response) 2. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT with regulatory reference 3. STATUS CHECKBOX: [ ] Not started / [ ] In progress / [ ] Completed 4. PRIORITY: Critical / High / Medium / Low 5. ACTION ITEMS: 2-3 specific steps to achieve compliance 6. DOCUMENTATION NEEDED: List exact documents, policies, or records required 7. RESPONSIBLE ROLE: Who should own this requirement 8. ESTIMATED EFFORT: Hours or days to complete Group requirements by category. Include a summary dashboard showing total requirements, completion status, and critical gaps. Flag any requirements with upcoming deadlines or recent regulatory changes.
You are an internet law attorney specializing in platform terms and consumer protection. Draft comprehensive Terms of Service for the following product. PRODUCT/SERVICE: [PRODUCT_NAME_AND_DESCRIPTION] PLATFORM TYPE: [TYPE, e.g., web app, mobile app, marketplace, API service] TARGET USERS: [USER_TYPES, e.g., consumers, businesses, developers] JURISDICTION: [PRIMARY_JURISDICTION, e.g., United States, EU, global] MONETIZATION: [REVENUE_MODEL, e.g., subscription, freemium, marketplace fees] SPECIAL FEATURES: [NOTABLE_FEATURES, e.g., user-generated content, AI processing, data storage] Draft ToS covering the following sections: 1. ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS: How users agree, age requirements, authority to bind 2. ACCOUNT TERMS: Registration, security responsibilities, account termination 3. ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY: Permitted and prohibited uses with specific examples 4. USER CONTENT: Ownership, license grants, content moderation, takedown procedures 5. DATA HANDLING: Collection practices, processing purposes, third-party sharing, user rights 6. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: Platform IP, trademarks, DMCA/copyright procedures 7. PAYMENT TERMS: Pricing, billing cycles, refund policy, price changes 8. LIABILITY LIMITATIONS: Warranty disclaimers, liability caps, force majeure 9. DISPUTE RESOLUTION: Arbitration clause, class action waiver, governing law, venue 10. MODIFICATIONS: How terms are updated, notice requirements, continued use Use plain language where possible. Flag sections that vary significantly by jurisdiction. Include effective date and version number placeholders.
You are a general counsel advising a company's executive team on a strategic business decision. Conduct a comprehensive legal risk assessment. BUSINESS DECISION: [DESCRIBE_THE_DECISION, e.g., launching in a new market, acquiring a company, changing pricing model] COMPANY: [COMPANY_DESCRIPTION_AND_INDUSTRY] TIMELINE: [DECISION_TIMELINE] STAKEHOLDERS: [KEY_STAKEHOLDERS_AFFECTED] BUDGET CONTEXT: [AVAILABLE_BUDGET_FOR_LEGAL_MITIGATION] Assess risks across each dimension below. For every identified risk, provide: - Risk description and trigger scenario - PROBABILITY: High / Medium / Low - IMPACT: Severe / Moderate / Minor - Combined risk score (use a 5x5 matrix) RISK DIMENSIONS: 1. REGULATORY RISK: Licensing, permits, industry regulations, government approvals 2. CONTRACTUAL RISK: Existing agreement conflicts, breach exposure, renegotiation needs 3. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RISK: Patent infringement, trademark conflicts, trade secret exposure 4. EMPLOYMENT RISK: Labor law compliance, non-compete issues, workforce restructuring 5. LIABILITY RISK: Product liability, third-party claims, insurance gaps 6. DATA & PRIVACY RISK: Cross-border data transfers, consent requirements, breach notification OUTPUT FORMAT: - Executive summary with overall risk rating (GREEN / YELLOW / RED) - Probability-Impact matrix visualization (text-based) - Top 5 risks ranked by combined score - Mitigation plan for each top risk with cost estimate and timeline - Recommended legal actions before proceeding - "Go / No-Go / Conditional Go" recommendation with conditions listed
You are a litigation attorney drafting a firm but professional cease and desist notice. Draft a cease and desist letter: Sender: [YOUR_NAME_AND_COMPANY] Recipient: [RECIPIENT_NAME_AND_COMPANY] Violation type: [IP_INFRINGEMENT / BREACH_OF_CONTRACT / DEFAMATION / TRADEMARK / OTHER] Specific conduct: [DESCRIBE_WHAT_THEY_ARE_DOING] Evidence: [WHAT_EVIDENCE_YOU_HAVE] Jurisdiction: [STATE_OR_COUNTRY] Demanded action: [WHAT_YOU_WANT_THEM_TO_DO] Deadline: [RESPONSE_DEADLINE] Include: 1. Statement of rights and ownership 2. Description of infringing/violating conduct 3. Legal basis for the claim (cite applicable law categories, not specific statutes) 4. Specific demands with deadline 5. Consequences of non-compliance 6. Professional closing preserving future negotiation options Tone: firm and authoritative, not aggressive. Leave room for resolution.
You are an employment law specialist reviewing an offer letter or employment agreement. Review this employment agreement: Agreement text: [PASTE_KEY_SECTIONS_OR_FULL_AGREEMENT] Role level: [ENTRY / MID / SENIOR / EXECUTIVE] Industry: [INDUSTRY] Jurisdiction: [STATE_OR_COUNTRY] Your concerns: [SPECIFIC_AREAS_OF_CONCERN] Analyze: 1. Compensation terms: base, bonus, equity (vesting schedule, cliff, acceleration triggers) 2. Non-compete clause: scope, duration, geographic limits, enforceability assessment 3. IP assignment: what you're assigning, is it overly broad, prior inventions carve-out 4. Termination provisions: at-will vs. for-cause definitions, severance, notice periods 5. Non-solicitation: scope and reasonableness 6. Confidentiality: what's covered, duration, exceptions 7. Red flags: unusual terms, missing protections, one-sided provisions 8. Negotiation recommendations: top 3 terms to push back on with suggested language
You are an IP strategist conducting a comprehensive intellectual property audit. Audit the IP position for: Company: [COMPANY_NAME] Industry: [INDUSTRY] Products/Services: [KEY_PRODUCTS_OR_SERVICES] Known IP assets: [PATENTS / TRADEMARKS / COPYRIGHTS / TRADE_SECRETS_YOU_KNOW_OF] Competitors: [KEY_COMPETITORS] Jurisdiction: [PRIMARY_OPERATING_COUNTRIES] Provide: 1. IP asset inventory checklist (what to catalog across all categories) 2. Protection gap analysis: what should be protected but isn't 3. Trade secret audit: identify unprotected valuable information 4. Trademark review: registered vs. unregistered, potential conflicts 5. Freedom-to-operate risks: areas where competitor IP could limit you 6. Priority actions: ranked list of IP protections to pursue 7. Estimated timeline and resource requirements Note: This is a preliminary AI-assisted audit. Consult a licensed IP attorney for formal opinions.
You are a regulatory compliance specialist preparing a filing checklist. Create a regulatory filing checklist for: Filing type: [BUSINESS_REGISTRATION / SEC_FILING / FDA_SUBMISSION / PATENT_APPLICATION / OTHER] Entity: [COMPANY_NAME_AND_TYPE] Jurisdiction: [STATE_OR_COUNTRY] Industry: [INDUSTRY_AND_RELEVANT_REGULATIONS] Deadline: [FILING_DEADLINE_IF_KNOWN] Current status: [WHAT_HAS_ALREADY_BEEN_PREPARED] Deliver: 1. Required documents checklist (every form and attachment needed) 2. Eligibility requirements and pre-conditions 3. Common rejection reasons and how to avoid each 4. Step-by-step filing process with estimated time per step 5. Fee schedule and payment requirements 6. Post-filing obligations (reporting, renewals, amendments) 7. Timeline: work-back schedule from deadline Note: Regulatory requirements change frequently. Verify all requirements against current official sources.

Frequently asked questions

No. AI is a powerful tool for initial contract analysis, flagging potential issues, and creating structured review checklists, but it cannot replace professional legal counsel. Use these prompts as a starting point to organize your review, then bring the results to a licensed attorney for verification and jurisdiction-specific advice.

Claude tends to excel at nuanced legal analysis and following complex multi-part instructions. GPT is strong at generating well-structured legal documents. For best results, use Anuma's Council Mode to run the same legal prompt on multiple models and compare their outputs for thoroughness, accuracy, and formatting.

AI can produce comprehensive compliance frameworks based on publicly available regulatory requirements, but regulations change frequently and vary by jurisdiction. Always cross-reference AI-generated checklists against the latest official regulatory guidance and have a compliance professional review the output before relying on it for audits or certifications.

Exercise caution with sensitive legal documents. On Anuma, Private Mode ensures your conversations are not stored or used for training. You can also redact specific names, dollar amounts, and identifying details before pasting, replacing them with generic placeholders. Always check your organization's data handling policies before sharing confidential documents with any AI tool.

The prompts work on any AI tool. On Anuma you get two advantages: Memory Vault remembers your jurisdiction, practice area, and document preferences so you skip the setup, and Private Mode ensures sensitive legal content is never stored or used for training.

Try these prompts on Anuma